Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦

現在の候補へスキップ 現在の除外候補へスキップ

ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。

下記へスキップ：

• 作品を推薦する
• 画像のガイドライン
• 現在の秀逸な画像の候補
• 秀逸な画像からの除外
• 現在の除外候補
• 秀逸な画像の候補での方針
• 目次

概要

推薦にあたって

推薦者のためのガイドライン

まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。

ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。

• 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル（1.92メガピクセル）は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。

コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なＰＣモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。

• スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。

• フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。

• 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか（例：後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等）を確認しましょう。

• 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。

• デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング（切り取り）等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。

• 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
  • たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
  • 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
  • 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。

技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。

• 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード（露光寛容度）と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合（部分）もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。

• 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ２本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも３分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する４つの交点の内どれか１つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。

• 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。　なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング（流し撮り）」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。

• 被写界深度（DOF）とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角（短焦点）レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠（長焦点）レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。

グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。

• 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。

• ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。

• 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。

• テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。

• 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。

• バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。

• 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。

主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。

• 『象徴性か妥当性か』　ー　『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。

画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。

画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。

新規推薦

推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。

ステップ１：画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー＆ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。

ステップ２：ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。

ステップ３：ステップ２で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}

投票

投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します：

• {{支持}}または{{Support}} （ Support、 Support),
• {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} （ Oppose、 Oppose),
• {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
• {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
• 情報：{{Info}} ( Info),
• 質問：{{Question}} ( Question).

テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます（可能ならば英語で）。

あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名（~~~~）も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。

秀逸な画像からの除外

時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}}  Keep 及び {{維持}}  Keep （＝『秀逸な画像』に値する）、または{{Delist}}  Delist 及び {{除外}}  Oppose （＝『秀逸な画像』に値しない）を投票します。

あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー＆ペーストします。

あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。

• 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
• その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク（画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています）。
• あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。

次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}

秀逸な画像の候補での方針

総則

1. 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後（下記タイムテーブル参照）に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。１０日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
2. 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
3. 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
4. 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
5. 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
6. 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" （推薦を取り下げます）と書くか、テンプレート {{withdraw|~~~~}} を加えます。
7. ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト（将来的なプロジェクト含む）に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
8. 推薦日から数えて５日間支持を受けられなかった画像（推薦者票含まず）は候補リストから外されます。（下記タイムテーブル参照）
9. テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。

秀逸と除外のルール

候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。

1. 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
2. 最低５票以上の支持票を得ている。
3. 支持：反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
4. ２つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。

除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後５日間で提出者以外の  Delist （ Oppose）票が得られなかった候補は、５日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。

常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。

何よりも礼儀を忘れずに

どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。

それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。

関連項目

• 候補リストの編集はこちら：Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
• 日付順秀逸な画像リスト：Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
• 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ：Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
• 推薦・投票の完了方法：Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
• 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
• 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
• Photography critiques（画像評論）
• Help:スキャニング

秀逸な画像の候補

purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates

File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 07:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 07:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Pine^✉ 07:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 06:54:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by NASA/Troy Cryder - uploaded by Elipongo - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support This is a second attempt at nominating this photo. The previous attempt was made in 2009, before the Space Shuttle program ended. I believe that the photo now has historic value and it seems to be an exemplar of this type of photo (two shuttles on pads) on English Wikipedia, where it is already featured. There may be artistic complaints about the composition but I think that they are outweighed by the historic value. The sharpness is not great but due to the long distances and the atmospheric effects I think that this is acceptable, given the other good qualities of the photo. -- Pine^✉ 06:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - As User:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover recommended in 2009, this should be nominated for VI (unless it's not the most useful image of both those shuttles on launch pads at the same time). It's a pretty image and interesting, but it looks noisy and the crops left and right are sub-optimal. (Now watch this pass with flying colors - perhaps.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 06:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info "A song of ice and fire": it looks like a glacier, but the colours are "fire"; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like the golden brown color tone of the landscape. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 13:07:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#United Kingdom
•  Info Mount Stuart House on the east coast of the Isle of Bute, Scotland, is a Gothic Revival country house and the ancestral home of the Marquesses of Bute. It was designed by Sir Robert Rowand Anderson for the 3rd Marquess of Bute in the late 1870s. The two wings are older. The home has a fine marble hall, private chapel, first-floor conservatory and heated pool. During World War I it was used as a military hospital and the conservatory was an operating theatre. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support High resolution panorama with sunlight bringing out the three dimensions of this "magnificent Gothic pile". -- Colin (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive resolution. Midday light is a bit harsh, and the WB looks a bit cold to me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Uoaei1 I think you are right, I've adjusted the WB and it is much happier now. -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per others for this beautiful photo. You could crop out the unsharpest part of the foreground, as I don't see any great advantage in including it, but that's not a good reason not to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support You hit the bull's eye. BRAVO! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 11:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment The description has duplicate the geocodes tags Ezarateesteban 11:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry for that! I removed the duplicate of the geocoding tag. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice, although maybe one step to the right would have been an improvement. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Would be better to remove the purple fringing if you can. --Laitche (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Great scene and I would love to call a shot like this my own but ... seems a little weirdly processed. The texture of the bark doesn't quite look natural, and the left edge of the church next to the sky seems to be a narrow pinkish blur. Was it downsized? Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: I took a close look, and I don't see the problem with the left edge of the church, which makes me suspect that your display may be the problem. The bark is difficult for me to judge but I don't see something that looks so bad that it's clearly a problem in my opinion, so I will  Support. --Pine^✉ 07:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• It was not shot in RAW, but in JPEG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Btw @Daniel Case:, the matter of fact, that the photo was shot on a chilly January winter morning and the position of the sun was way down low (so the sunlight had to penetrate the hazy atmosphere almost parallel to the surface of the earth), the whole scenery is plunged in the long-wave reddish light; that’s the reason why the bark of the tilia trees is not brownish but more on the reddish side. That circumstance can evoke an unnatural appearance. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phalacrocoracidae_(Cormorants)
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome capture, possibly a POTY 2018 candidate. Not only is the technical quality very good (so good you can even see the pupil of the eye), the bird's posture is also something to savour. A real "moment frozen in time" kind of shot.--Peulle (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I concur with the others, but is the young fledgling begging for food? If so, let's specify that in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Comment I'm actually not sure what kind of behavior this individual is showing. Maybe one of our biologists could help. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

From the picture, it looks like the bird is calling, making some kind of noise for some unspecified reason.--Peulle (talk) 08:38, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good, although I feel that there is something missing (food?) --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Great image. Smooth colors and well composed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Coffee and cake for me, please! --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Cozy! This is the sort of image that, when I say it looks like something from a tourist brochure, I mean it as a compliment. Daniel Case (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info It was a sunny morning, the sun shines towards the castle and I like the composition with the clear blue sky. --XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice, but too much sky. I would support with a crop. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I like it with the sky. IMO the image composition wouldn't be better with less sky. Nevertheless: I'll check it with the castle one third of the image. --XRay ^talk 05:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed CAs best possible removed. Thank you. --11:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Sharpened with high-pass filter too. --XRay ^talk 19:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info A alternative with less sky. --XRay ^talk 05:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Some chromatic aberration are visible (on the benches for example) -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm not ready to vote on either version, but my reaction at this point is that both versions probably have more sky than I'd prefer. I prefer this version, though, and may support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed CAs best possible removed. Thank you. --11:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Both versions work for me. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Still a lot of sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info I just uploaded a new version of the alternative sharpened with high-pass filter. --XRay ^talk 19:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support But per Uoaie1 --Poco² 19:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support I wish it were sharper on the building but I think you've done what you could there. Daniel Case (talk) 23:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC), but I prefer the 2nd. alternative (a bit too much sky)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 03:34:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but I think the light isn't right for this one; I would have preferred the sun at a different angle.--Peulle (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like the silhouettes Poco² 19:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 19:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition, photo shows main object inclusive the environment. Excellent light conditions, nearly no shadows --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Just enough sharpening there ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 17:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by-- Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment WB seems a little too cool ... perhaps you could adjust the blue curve a bit? Or boost the other ones? Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose You also have to fix the CAs. Not the best technical quality overall. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 17:10:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Devotion of Polish People in All Saints' Day, Holy Cross Cemetery in Gniezno, Poland. All by me, Poco² 17:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 17:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Moving. You could choose to decrease the noise if you like, but either way, you have my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support same --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ven a México para dia de Muertos... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

  Esta pendiente, Tomascastelazo,... --Poco² 06:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support First of November is getting closer. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 13:47:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
•  Info created by U.S. Navy - uploaded by Quasipalm - nominated by Philroc -- Philroc (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Philroc (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just doesn't work like some other 9/11 images (like the firefighters raising the flag) do. Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm moved by this. It's possible that as a New Yorker who knows that this firefighter probably died from breathing in the cancer-causing fumes, I'm biased, but it gets my vote. And it's certainly a striking composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Archive related to an important historical event, but the image is not striking enough, and the quality as bad as a 70 year-old photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Striking image, but low resolution and bad quality, specially color noise. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann.--Peulle (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created & uploaded by User:KristianPikner - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I know photos of aurorae can be controversial at FPC, but the immensity of the aurora in the sky and its reflection in the water below are really special to me. I also think the quality and amount of noise are quite good, considering the situation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Please allow me to direct your collective attention to this image, of which this nomination is a slightly modified copy. Said image is already an FP and was a finalist in PotY 2017. As the images are almost identical, I humbly suggest that this nomination is withdrawn.--Peulle (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Just for the record: they are indeed very similar, but this is quite obviously not a copy derived from the same base image. Look at the land on the right, that's clearly two different pictures, either taken from different positions or with different water levels. --El Grafo (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sure, but if this is promoted, it says that we can nominate several images that are very similar and expect them to be promoted. Instead of choosing the single best one out of a series, a photographer could shoot a whole series of images and nominate them all. It would undermine what FPC is all about; choosing the single best image between many candidates.--Peulle (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• I think they're significantly different and that that's evident from comparing them by clicking back and forth between them. I'll wait a little longer, and if it becomes obvious that there's nevertheless a consensus for your view, I will withdraw, but I don't agree with you. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• That we disagree on an issue is of course fine; I stand by my point, though, and I feel that if yours prevailed, I should be able to nominate all four images in my M32 series since they're slightly different, and I just don't believe that is the intention behind FPC.--Peulle (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• You're able to nominate them, but I get your point, and so far, others seem to agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose - I have to side with Peulle here. -- Philroc (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle --GeXeS (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info created and uploaded by User:Llez - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I find this a particularly beautiful shell, and it's also particularly well-photographed, even for Llez. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Shellicious.--Peulle (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Ikan for nomination --Llez (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Happy to do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:13:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Myroslav Vydrak -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Tilted ccw - Please check the perspective. The wind wheels for example are not straightly vertical. Also the image name needs to be more precise - should mention the name of the church. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - These are old buildings, and all it are leaning different sides. I don't feel it's necessary to check the perspective just for the wind wheels and other buildings on the background, but thanks for remark. Name of the church is in description, and link too - as for me it's enough. --Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose The far landscape at the top is too distracting from the cityscape for me. Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 10:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#History
•  Info created by Terence Cuneo - uploaded by Mr impossible - nominated by Peulle
•  Support --Peulle (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice digitization; evenly lit. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither the subject, the resolution, or the quality make this special. --Yann (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann: no wow for me. --El Grafo (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 10:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#History
•  Info created by Terence Cuneo - uploaded by Mr impossible - nominated by Peulle -- Peulle (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Peulle (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment There's a vertical line at the right which is worth to be cropped -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I agree but I'm not allowed to crop it, so I'm not sure how to proceed.--Peulle (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• You may overwrite it per Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO overwrite (minor cropping) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Done--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral The frame is showing at the right and it appears from that that the image is slightly tilted. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither the subject, the resolution, or the quality make this special. --Yann (talk) 08:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 06:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info Gargoyle at the west tower of Ulm Minster, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really finding anything remarkable about this. Just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

You are probably free from giddiness. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose For me, the sun is slightly in the wrong place. It makes the sky very very bright and the gargoyle is a bit dark.--Peulle (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, no wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Washed-out sky. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 03:26:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created & uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Sibling for this POTY finalist ? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 06:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose While the walls are unusual, we have several better FPs of such stations. The composition here is very static, off centre, with distracting elements (fluorescent strip lamp, black plastic sheet over something on the left). The highlights in the lamp have been reduced too far. -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Qualified support While Colin has a point about the lamp highlights (particularly on the one closer to the camera), otherwise the issues he identified do not bother me too much. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per Daniel Case but the upper right corner is too distracting to me. --Laitche (talk) 02:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the composition, but it is too soft to me Poco² 19:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 03:23:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Info created & uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice image, but the sky and lighting aren't too exciting. I think there are some better candidates among the other images in the category.--Peulle (talk) 06:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are two FP's of this lighthouse already by ArildV. File:Landsort lighthouse 2012b.jpg and File:Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 09.jpg, the second of which is superior to this. -- Colin (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I was thinking about that one too. Btw should the first one be delisted? It looks quite similar and the sky is kinda grey ...--Peulle (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose; the second one Colin links to is waaay better. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 02:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, absolutely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Formidable. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice mood. The bag thing on the far right is sort of spoiling the "purity" of the scene, but I'm not really in favour of photographers' cleaning up places before shooting just to make it look nicer.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Balanced composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice pattern on the ground, and the highlights on the clouds are handled as well as they could be. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 00:25:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info all by me-- Ezarateesteban 00:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment It seems underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good for illustrative purposes, articles and such, but the lighting is not good for FP.--Peulle (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment look now @Basile Morin: and @Peulle: tone curves improved Ezarateesteban 10:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• Yes the light is better now -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Sky at top is kind of noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: NR applied Ezarateesteban 23:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

That's better now. But if you could also do something about what I noticed while looking at it ... a bit of blue/orange CA on the spotlight and the pedestal behind it. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done Ezarateesteban 00:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 20:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's nice but I don't feel like it's an FP; the tree and the fence in the foreground take up too much space, I feel.--Peulle (talk) 22:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support The right border could be cut on 1 mm, but yes it's a gorgeous scenery with fascinating reliefs. Feeling of another century -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. Lovely, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Like a fairy tale. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support The mist really adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
• Former FPD.

let it be my nomination. Renominate and  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support very nice --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support really great --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice morning mood. --Laitche (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 19:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Canada
•  Info All by me, -- Podzemnik (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely light.--Peulle (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Didn't notice the downsizing so I'll hold off my vote. I still like the light, though.--Peulle (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Explanation deemed acceptable.--Peulle (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

No worries, Peulle, I'm quite strictly against downsizing. I downsized only once or twice, and it was when I worked with panoramas which were so big that my computer kept freezing. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose My first reaction was "That's not a castle. That's a four bed house with pretensions". But then I realise you've photographed the side. It is photographed too close, which results in strange asymmetrical effects to the rounded parts and spire. 16mm on a full frame camera is ultra-wide and not really appealing for exterior architecture unless you are going for an effect. I appreciate it may not be possible to get much further back. At 7MP this appears to be 70% downsized from the 20MP camera. Please can you upload upload the original? -- Colin (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for you comment, Colin. I didn't downsize the image, the pixels were lost after I fixed the perspective and cropped the image. I couldn't get any further since from the western side there is a only a small driveway and then steep stairs down. Also, I think I left a bit more space on the sides than necessary because at that time I wasn't sure if I'd need that space during quite heavy perspective correction. Well, now I know than no, I wouldn't really need it :) I uploaded the original RAW here. Any advice how to improve my post processing is highly appreciated. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Simply great! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Not huge in size but an amazing building, and I love the light through the windows at this special time of the day -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)~
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 13:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info The so called "Carrier snails" collect stones, corals, and also shells and affix them at their own shell; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --GeXeS (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- P999 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support. Could you put that sentence, along with a mention that this is a carrier snail, in the file description? I was thinking that perhaps it was a fossil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 01:02:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Cool. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing topic. Special composition. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 04:35, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 04:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sadly I don't find the light too impressive and the grey sky is boring.--Peulle (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bright orange requires each element works. Here there is a monk cut behind a small out-building. The monks weeding the pavement is just a really awful subject. Everyone with their back to us. There's a big hole in the middle of the composition, with orange at the outer sides. -- Colin (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

• Yes there is a "monk cut behind a small out-building", not really visible. Then, weeding the pavement to keep this place clean and attractive is less "awful" than honorable in my view, as these monks take care of their elegant temple. It also gives a realistic insight of their daily occupations, productive and respectable -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• < Comment Needs some slight perspective correction. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

 fixed Thanks, Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

 Support now. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 21:16:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, excellent, but please change the filename to eliminate typos (view of the old bridge, not view od the odl bridge). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Ikan Kekek, I'm sorry for my mistake. I applied a name change. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sharpness on the right side of the image (foreground, far end of the bridge) is too bad for me to support, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find it very nice, reminds me of one of my FP. However, per Uoaei. A pity --A.Savin 12:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yes, I immediately thought of that photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Regretful oppose per Uoaei. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Uoaei1 --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose An ordinary shot to me, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:FEZ trial gameplay HD.webm (delist)

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 16:10:30

Play media

Old encode.

Play media

New encode.

•  Info There are some reasons to replace. (Original nomination)
  1. New encode is in VP9 which brings better quality to video. Above that, the bitrate is now closer to the original file, to avoid over-compression.
  2. New encode uses Opus as audio codec, which should improve compression and quality.
  3. The old encode has its color matrix incorrectly set, which result in the rendered colors being incorrect. This is fixed in the new file.
  4. You can see a simple comparison here.
•  Delist and replace -- FakeShemp (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
• I can't discern any material difference from the framecompare.com comparison link. If it's a better encode, feel free to just drop it over the existing file. I used whatever tool was available at the time. czar 10:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately I can not simply drop it over the old encode because it's over 100MB, the max size updates can have. Therefore a new upload. FakeShemp (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace Although I'm not qualified to quantify the difference between the versions, I do get the impression that the new one is at least slightly better.--Peulle (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace probably also bes to delete the old one and redirect to the new? --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 06:27:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info Main altar (Hutz-Altar) of Ulm Minster, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful photo.--Peulle (talk) 14:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Some blown areas in the bottom of the center window, but the windows aren't the subject and it looks from the rest of the image like you've done everything you can about things like that. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Icem4k (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - per Peulle -- P999 (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 01:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, just 8 windows...--Karelj (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support For me it's more than just 8 windows. Interesting colors and composition. --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

• +1 --Laitche (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose --Icem4k (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - We see once again that this kind of photo is popular here, but it doesn't do enough to make me find it special. Maybe if the light were more striking, perhaps. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: The criterion of good photo is not one, I think you have a fixed idea too much --Laitche (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• If you insist on my being more specific, the problem I have with this photo is that it's not that interesting for me to move my eyes around it, and then there isn't anything spectacular purely on the image level that would cause me to vote for a feature even though the form, in the terms in which I understand and experience form as something active involving my eyes moving around the picture frame, is not that interesting. If that's not specific enough for you, I could always choose to fall back on the very unspecific "no wow", which we are permitted to use as a reason for opposing. And if you find my taste uncongenial to you, just accept that it's different from yours, OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sure! --Laitche (talk) 09:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose I see nothing to convince me. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's useful (VI) since it illustrates an architectural style that some might find a bit plain, and it's of good technical quality (QI) but I don't see it being spectacular enough for the FP status.--Peulle (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment User:Alvesgaspar nominated many this kind of photos though only few photos were featured. Yes, the light is not striking but I can also get sort of Zen and static feeling from this photo. In that mean, this one is special, IMHO. --Laitche (talk) 08:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 23:01:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I think these colors are real. --Laitche (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I usually don't like flares but this doesn't subtract at all. A bit high on the contrast? Still a support from me either way. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Beautiful view but I can't believe these red rays below the sun, and the sky also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Real or not, it wows me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Colors sort of remind me of the cover of Led Zeppelin's Houses of the Holy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: I like The Rain Song --Laitche (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 21:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Love the lighting in the picture. --Icem4k (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Question I concur with Basile, it doesn't look really realistic. Can you provide an statement about that, Tournasol7? Poco² 19:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment But it is realistic. That sunset was really red-orange. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 21:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info Interior view of the nave of the church of St Felix, Torralba de Ribota, province of Zaragoza, Spain. The church, of mudéjar and late gothic style was built between 1367 and 1420. The church is a national heritage monument in Spain (known as Bien de Interés Cultural) since 2006 and it didn't have a free license image until now. Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Distracting corner at the bottom left -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

  What do you mean? :) Now seriously, I don't think that was a major issue to oppose but still, gone, --Poco² 19:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral after correction. Yes, this dark corner was very intrusive. So please, Poco, understand why I opposed here your picture, instead of contesting the issue you've just fixed. We certainly see things differently. You find this image awesome, while I just consider it very ordinary, with honesty and good faith. We have tons of similar pictures of religious buildings here (mainly christian, not much other religions represented) and this one is just one more. Due to the distorted perspective, this church looks giant inside, while the reality is probably very different. I personally prefer non-deformed perspective because it gives a better idea of how the interior is in truth. The color is yellowish, so not very aesthetic. In these conditions, an intrusive object spoiling the left corner to completely break the symmetry was just too much. This is only my subjective opinion, and your photo also gets 5 supports. Now I'm neutral because the correction was made successfully -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 19:45:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by SpaceX - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by Msaynevirta -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --BugWarp (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dark night-shot with harsh contrasts. Not enough of the space ship is visible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small, and a little hard to tell what it was about at first. I'd rather see the whole rocket, the crop at left is bad, and even allowing for the circumstances the noise and posterization are pretty severe. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The rest of the ship should be in the photo. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The space ship isnt visible enough --Icem4k (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 08:57:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Mdbeckwith - uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Σπάρτακος (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I would change the FP Category to Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Done --Σπάρτακος (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I like the earthy, warm colors; I like that you can read the names on the list of vicars on the wall, but I don't like the red halos around the lamps near the altar. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 01:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop at the bottom is too tight and the picture tilted. Also for the red halos mentioned by Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel's weak oppose, as I consider the blown-out lamps and so forth to be unimportant enough to overlook in my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 20:15:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Васягина - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KSK (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
• Looks pretty good, like a strange planet or something, so the wow factor is there. As it's currently downsized by 50%, however, it's a straight-forward  Oppose from me.--Peulle (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sort of per Peulle. The cliffs has a bright thin "aura" that sometimes comes from downsizing. If the original photo was uploaded, I would probably reconsider. --Cart (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  On hold Very nice. I may support the original file -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Cart and Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  On hold per Basile -- P999 (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support WOW --Laitche (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - I love it, but I'm not sure whether to vote for it, as I'd really like to see what the full-size photo looks like, if there is one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

  Here you are, the full size is uploaded on behalf of the author. --KSK (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Thank you. Great, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Photo calendar quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 09:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Mattbuck - uploaded by Mattbuck - nominated by Pkbwcgs -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean. It is a train passing at speed as the vibrant light shows and it is a silhouetted night time. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

It's called "night" Basile Morin... -mattbuck (Talk) 14:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• Guidelines for nominators : Night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime. Examples of successful night shots recently promoted : 1, 2, 3, but unsuccessful dark shots : 1, 2, 3, recently declined -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• Not sure why you included a daytime shot of a bird among the unsuccessful night nominations or why you chose blood moon photos as they can hardly be photographed in bright light. It would have been better if you used photos of structures and landscapes as examples, those are what the rule you quoted are for. --Cart (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• All night shots are not dark, and all dark shots are not night -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile Morin. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. Interesting idea but too dark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Almost works, but for the lights at left. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 08:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ethiopia
•  Info Gaet'ale Pond in the Danakil Depression, Ethiopia ----- All by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 08:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 11:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Appropriate use of wide angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose A small body of water in a generally flat, dull landscape under a dodgy sky. Doesn't really wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• Similar FPs : 1, 2, 3, 4 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

The first three make abstract patterns of their own not seen here. I opposed the fourth. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Daniel Case. --Karelj (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Yes it's real dull landscape but this image gives me the feeling that I am very thirsty. So a wow, because I am desiring for some water! --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It isn't talking to me, sorry Poco² 19:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 08:15:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 08:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 08:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Despite moiré. --Laitche (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please, where have you seen moiré? --XRay ^talk 16:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed Hopefully found and fixed. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 16:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice, but the crop ruins it for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2018 at 15:43:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Italy
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I love Venice and its palaces. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I wish the building had been more vivid, but that does not appear to be your fault. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, just house. --Karelj (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• It's not only a house it is also a 15th century palace in Venice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:42, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  • But looks like old unkempt house. --Karelj (talk) 21:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
    • That is what fascinates me of Venice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2018 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Japan
•  Info This shot was taken just after the rain thus some areas were still in shadow of clouds especially on the bottom left. Created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Rather dark. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts:  Brightened. --Laitche (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral Still darker than I'd prefer, but one thing I didn't notice the first time around is that the detail is a bit lacking. Great scene with great lighting though so I won't oppose. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts: I think this lens is not so sharp, I also had Canon EF16-35mm f/4L IS USM in that time but I couldn't use that. Just I didn't have a time to change lens since this scene has disappeared in an instant. --Laitche (talk) 01:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Could be a little bit more tree at the left, but OK. --XRay ^talk 13:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support beautiful composition and colors, although the detail in the trees at the upper right seems less than ideal. --Pine^✉ 07:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2018 at 12:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Mattbuck - uploaded by Mattbuck - nominated by Pkbwcgs -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image consists of lots of cut structures and elements surrounding an empty dark space, sorry, that composition is not working for me. --Cart (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I Like.....it seems confused, like a big city --Σπάρτακος (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cart. I can attest from personal experience before Wikimania 2014 that there are ample featured media opportunities on the DLR; however, this is not one of them. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it, but not enough to vote for it, my apologies. The atmosphere reminds me of Ghost in the Shell movies... --GeXeS (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. Cyberpunky --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Martin. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dark, chaotic, and nothing spectacular there -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Not chaotic, IMO, but exciting. I will support if the horizontal striations in the sky are cleaned up or a natural explanation can be given for them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

  Possibly bits of cloud, honestly not sure. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

  Looks like subtle posterization to me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates

File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 07:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-129 Atlantis Ready to Fly.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 07:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Pine^✉ 07:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 06:54:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Space shuttles Atlantis (STS-125) and Endeavour (STS-400) on launch pads.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by NASA/Troy Cryder - uploaded by Elipongo - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support This is a second attempt at nominating this photo. The previous attempt was made in 2009, before the Space Shuttle program ended. I believe that the photo now has historic value and it seems to be an exemplar of this type of photo (two shuttles on pads) on English Wikipedia, where it is already featured. There may be artistic complaints about the composition but I think that they are outweighed by the historic value. The sharpness is not great but due to the long distances and the atmospheric effects I think that this is acceptable, given the other good qualities of the photo. -- Pine^✉ 06:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - As User:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover recommended in 2009, this should be nominated for VI (unless it's not the most useful image of both those shuttles on launch pads at the same time). It's a pretty image and interesting, but it looks noisy and the crops left and right are sub-optimal. (Now watch this pass with flying colors - perhaps.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2018 at 06:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 19.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info "A song of ice and fire": it looks like a glacier, but the colours are "fire"; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like the golden brown color tone of the landscape. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 13:07:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Stuart House 2018-08-25.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#United Kingdom
•  Info Mount Stuart House on the east coast of the Isle of Bute, Scotland, is a Gothic Revival country house and the ancestral home of the Marquesses of Bute. It was designed by Sir Robert Rowand Anderson for the 3rd Marquess of Bute in the late 1870s. The two wings are older. The home has a fine marble hall, private chapel, first-floor conservatory and heated pool. During World War I it was used as a military hospital and the conservatory was an operating theatre. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support High resolution panorama with sunlight bringing out the three dimensions of this "magnificent Gothic pile". -- Colin (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive resolution. Midday light is a bit harsh, and the WB looks a bit cold to me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Uoaei1 I think you are right, I've adjusted the WB and it is much happier now. -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per others for this beautiful photo. You could crop out the unsharpest part of the foreground, as I don't see any great advantage in including it, but that's not a good reason not to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support You hit the bull's eye. BRAVO! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 11:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment The description has duplicate the geocodes tags Ezarateesteban 11:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry for that! I removed the duplicate of the geocoding tag. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice, although maybe one step to the right would have been an improvement. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Would be better to remove the purple fringing if you can. --Laitche (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Great scene and I would love to call a shot like this my own but ... seems a little weirdly processed. The texture of the bark doesn't quite look natural, and the left edge of the church next to the sky seems to be a narrow pinkish blur. Was it downsized? Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: I took a close look, and I don't see the problem with the left edge of the church, which makes me suspect that your display may be the problem. The bark is difficult for me to judge but I don't see something that looks so bad that it's clearly a problem in my opinion, so I will  Support. --Pine^✉ 07:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• It was not shot in RAW, but in JPEG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Btw @Daniel Case:, the matter of fact, that the photo was shot on a chilly January winter morning and the position of the sun was way down low (so the sunlight had to penetrate the hazy atmosphere almost parallel to the surface of the earth), the whole scenery is plunged in the long-wave reddish light; that’s the reason why the bark of the tilia trees is not brownish but more on the reddish side. That circumstance can evoke an unnatural appearance. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kormoran am Nordseestrand bei Nebel, Amrum.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phalacrocoracidae_(Cormorants)
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome capture, possibly a POTY 2018 candidate. Not only is the technical quality very good (so good you can even see the pupil of the eye), the bird's posture is also something to savour. A real "moment frozen in time" kind of shot.--Peulle (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I concur with the others, but is the young fledgling begging for food? If so, let's specify that in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Comment I'm actually not sure what kind of behavior this individual is showing. Maybe one of our biologists could help. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

From the picture, it looks like the bird is calling, making some kind of noise for some unspecified reason.--Peulle (talk) 08:38, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good, although I feel that there is something missing (food?) --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dörnsk an Köögem, Amrum (2018).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Great image. Smooth colors and well composed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Coffee and cake for me, please! --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Cozy! This is the sort of image that, when I say it looks like something from a tourist brochure, I mean it as a compliment. Daniel Case (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 05:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1930-31.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info It was a sunny morning, the sun shines towards the castle and I like the composition with the clear blue sky. --XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice, but too much sky. I would support with a crop. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I like it with the sky. IMO the image composition wouldn't be better with less sky. Nevertheless: I'll check it with the castle one third of the image. --XRay ^talk 05:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed CAs best possible removed. Thank you. --11:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Sharpened with high-pass filter too. --XRay ^talk 19:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info A alternative with less sky. --XRay ^talk 05:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Some chromatic aberration are visible (on the benches for example) -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm not ready to vote on either version, but my reaction at this point is that both versions probably have more sky than I'd prefer. I prefer this version, though, and may support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed CAs best possible removed. Thank you. --11:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Both versions work for me. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Still a lot of sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info I just uploaded a new version of the alternative sharpened with high-pass filter. --XRay ^talk 19:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support But per Uoaie1 --Poco² 19:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support I wish it were sharper on the building but I think you've done what you could there. Daniel Case (talk) 23:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC), but I prefer the 2nd. alternative (a bit too much sky)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 03:34:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saguaro forest in Sonora.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but I think the light isn't right for this one; I would have preferred the sun at a different angle.--Peulle (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like the silhouettes Poco² 19:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 19:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breisach - Breisacher Münster1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition, photo shows main object inclusive the environment. Excellent light conditions, nearly no shadows --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Just enough sharpening there ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 17:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by-- Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment WB seems a little too cool ... perhaps you could adjust the blue curve a bit? Or boost the other ones? Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose You also have to fix the CAs. Not the best technical quality overall. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 17:10:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Celebración de Todos los Santos, cementerio de la Santa Cruz, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-11-01, DD 19-30 PAN HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Devotion of Polish People in All Saints' Day, Holy Cross Cemetery in Gniezno, Poland. All by me, Poco² 17:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 17:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Moving. You could choose to decrease the noise if you like, but either way, you have my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support same --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ven a México para dia de Muertos... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

  Esta pendiente, Tomascastelazo,... --Poco² 06:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support First of November is getting closer. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 13:47:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:September 14 2001 Ground Zero 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
•  Info created by U.S. Navy - uploaded by Quasipalm - nominated by Philroc -- Philroc (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Philroc (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just doesn't work like some other 9/11 images (like the firefighters raising the flag) do. Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm moved by this. It's possible that as a New Yorker who knows that this firefighter probably died from breathing in the cancer-causing fumes, I'm biased, but it gets my vote. And it's certainly a striking composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Archive related to an important historical event, but the image is not striking enough, and the quality as bad as a 70 year-old photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Striking image, but low resolution and bad quality, specially color noise. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann.--Peulle (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created & uploaded by User:KristianPikner - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I know photos of aurorae can be controversial at FPC, but the immensity of the aurora in the sky and its reflection in the water below are really special to me. I also think the quality and amount of noise are quite good, considering the situation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Please allow me to direct your collective attention to this image, of which this nomination is a slightly modified copy. Said image is already an FP and was a finalist in PotY 2017. As the images are almost identical, I humbly suggest that this nomination is withdrawn.--Peulle (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Just for the record: they are indeed very similar, but this is quite obviously not a copy derived from the same base image. Look at the land on the right, that's clearly two different pictures, either taken from different positions or with different water levels. --El Grafo (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sure, but if this is promoted, it says that we can nominate several images that are very similar and expect them to be promoted. Instead of choosing the single best one out of a series, a photographer could shoot a whole series of images and nominate them all. It would undermine what FPC is all about; choosing the single best image between many candidates.--Peulle (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• I think they're significantly different and that that's evident from comparing them by clicking back and forth between them. I'll wait a little longer, and if it becomes obvious that there's nevertheless a consensus for your view, I will withdraw, but I don't agree with you. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• That we disagree on an issue is of course fine; I stand by my point, though, and I feel that if yours prevailed, I should be able to nominate all four images in my M32 series since they're slightly different, and I just don't believe that is the intention behind FPC.--Peulle (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• You're able to nominate them, but I get your point, and so far, others seem to agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose - I have to side with Peulle here. -- Philroc (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle --GeXeS (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Septaria tesselata 01.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info created and uploaded by User:Llez - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I find this a particularly beautiful shell, and it's also particularly well-photographed, even for Llez. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Shellicious.--Peulle (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Ikan for nomination --Llez (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Happy to do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2018 at 08:13:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018L2786 - Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Myroslav Vydrak -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Tilted ccw - Please check the perspective. The wind wheels for example are not straightly vertical. Also the image name needs to be more precise - should mention the name of the church. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - These are old buildings, and all it are leaning different sides. I don't feel it's necessary to check the perspective just for the wind wheels and other buildings on the background, but thanks for remark. Name of the church is in description, and link too - as for me it's enough. --Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose The far landscape at the top is too distracting from the cityscape for me. Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 10:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-19 Invasion scene Artist Terence Cuneo 1939-1946.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#History
•  Info created by Terence Cuneo - uploaded by Mr impossible - nominated by Peulle
•  Support --Peulle (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice digitization; evenly lit. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither the subject, the resolution, or the quality make this special. --Yann (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann: no wow for me. --El Grafo (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 10:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:INF3-45 Aircraft attack British battleship Artist Terence Cuneo.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#History
•  Info created by Terence Cuneo - uploaded by Mr impossible - nominated by Peulle -- Peulle (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Peulle (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment There's a vertical line at the right which is worth to be cropped -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I agree but I'm not allowed to crop it, so I'm not sure how to proceed.--Peulle (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• You may overwrite it per Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO overwrite (minor cropping) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Done--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral The frame is showing at the right and it appears from that that the image is slightly tilted. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither the subject, the resolution, or the quality make this special. --Yann (talk) 08:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 06:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Westturm Wasserspeier 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info Gargoyle at the west tower of Ulm Minster, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really finding anything remarkable about this. Just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

You are probably free from giddiness. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose For me, the sun is slightly in the wrong place. It makes the sky very very bright and the gargoyle is a bit dark.--Peulle (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, no wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Washed-out sky. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 03:26:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created & uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Sibling for this POTY finalist ? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 06:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose While the walls are unusual, we have several better FPs of such stations. The composition here is very static, off centre, with distracting elements (fluorescent strip lamp, black plastic sheet over something on the left). The highlights in the lamp have been reduced too far. -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Qualified support While Colin has a point about the lamp highlights (particularly on the one closer to the camera), otherwise the issues he identified do not bother me too much. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per Daniel Case but the upper right corner is too distracting to me. --Laitche (talk) 02:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the composition, but it is too soft to me Poco² 19:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 03:23:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Info created & uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice image, but the sky and lighting aren't too exciting. I think there are some better candidates among the other images in the category.--Peulle (talk) 06:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are two FP's of this lighthouse already by ArildV. File:Landsort lighthouse 2012b.jpg and File:Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 09.jpg, the second of which is superior to this. -- Colin (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I was thinking about that one too. Btw should the first one be delisted? It looks quite similar and the sky is kinda grey ...--Peulle (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose; the second one Colin links to is waaay better. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 02:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opaque and mirroring green paddy fields with palm tree.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, absolutely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Formidable. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice mood. The bag thing on the far right is sort of spoiling the "purity" of the scene, but I'm not really in favour of photographers' cleaning up places before shooting just to make it look nicer.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Balanced composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice pattern on the ground, and the highlights on the clouds are handled as well as they could be. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2018 at 00:25:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info all by me-- Ezarateesteban 00:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment It seems underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good for illustrative purposes, articles and such, but the lighting is not good for FP.--Peulle (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment look now @Basile Morin: and @Peulle: tone curves improved Ezarateesteban 10:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• Yes the light is better now -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Sky at top is kind of noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: NR applied Ezarateesteban 23:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

That's better now. But if you could also do something about what I noticed while looking at it ... a bit of blue/orange CA on the spotlight and the pedestal behind it. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done Ezarateesteban 00:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 20:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's nice but I don't feel like it's an FP; the tree and the fence in the foreground take up too much space, I feel.--Peulle (talk) 22:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support The right border could be cut on 1 mm, but yes it's a gorgeous scenery with fascinating reliefs. Feeling of another century -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. Lovely, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Like a fairy tale. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support The mist really adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
• Former FPD.

let it be my nomination. Renominate and  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support very nice --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support really great --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice morning mood. --Laitche (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 19:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Canada
•  Info All by me, -- Podzemnik (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely light.--Peulle (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Didn't notice the downsizing so I'll hold off my vote. I still like the light, though.--Peulle (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Explanation deemed acceptable.--Peulle (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

No worries, Peulle, I'm quite strictly against downsizing. I downsized only once or twice, and it was when I worked with panoramas which were so big that my computer kept freezing. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose My first reaction was "That's not a castle. That's a four bed house with pretensions". But then I realise you've photographed the side. It is photographed too close, which results in strange asymmetrical effects to the rounded parts and spire. 16mm on a full frame camera is ultra-wide and not really appealing for exterior architecture unless you are going for an effect. I appreciate it may not be possible to get much further back. At 7MP this appears to be 70% downsized from the 20MP camera. Please can you upload upload the original? -- Colin (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for you comment, Colin. I didn't downsize the image, the pixels were lost after I fixed the perspective and cropped the image. I couldn't get any further since from the western side there is a only a small driveway and then steep stairs down. Also, I think I left a bit more space on the sides than necessary because at that time I wasn't sure if I'd need that space during quite heavy perspective correction. Well, now I know than no, I wouldn't really need it :) I uploaded the original RAW here. Any advice how to improve my post processing is highly appreciated. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Simply great! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Not huge in size but an amazing building, and I love the light through the windows at this special time of the day -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)~
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 13:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xenophora mekranensis konoi 01.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info The so called "Carrier snails" collect stones, corals, and also shells and affix them at their own shell; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --GeXeS (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- P999 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support. Could you put that sentence, along with a mention that this is a carrier snail, in the file description? I was thinking that perhaps it was a fossil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2018 at 01:02:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monks cleaning the yard at Wat Xieng Thong temple.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Cool. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing topic. Special composition. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 04:35, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 04:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sadly I don't find the light too impressive and the grey sky is boring.--Peulle (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bright orange requires each element works. Here there is a monk cut behind a small out-building. The monks weeding the pavement is just a really awful subject. Everyone with their back to us. There's a big hole in the middle of the composition, with orange at the outer sides. -- Colin (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

• Yes there is a "monk cut behind a small out-building", not really visible. Then, weeding the pavement to keep this place clean and attractive is less "awful" than honorable in my view, as these monks take care of their elegant temple. It also gives a realistic insight of their daily occupations, productive and respectable -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• < Comment Needs some slight perspective correction. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

 fixed Thanks, Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

 Support now. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 21:16:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View od the odl bridge over Main in Wurzburg 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, excellent, but please change the filename to eliminate typos (view of the old bridge, not view od the odl bridge). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Ikan Kekek, I'm sorry for my mistake. I applied a name change. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sharpness on the right side of the image (foreground, far end of the bridge) is too bad for me to support, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find it very nice, reminds me of one of my FP. However, per Uoaei. A pity --A.Savin 12:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yes, I immediately thought of that photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Regretful oppose per Uoaei. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Uoaei1 --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose An ordinary shot to me, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:FEZ trial gameplay HD.webm (delist)

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 16:10:30

Play media

Old encode.

Play media

New encode.

•  Info There are some reasons to replace. (Original nomination)
  1. New encode is in VP9 which brings better quality to video. Above that, the bitrate is now closer to the original file, to avoid over-compression.
  2. New encode uses Opus as audio codec, which should improve compression and quality.
  3. The old encode has its color matrix incorrectly set, which result in the rendered colors being incorrect. This is fixed in the new file.
  4. You can see a simple comparison here.
•  Delist and replace -- FakeShemp (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
• I can't discern any material difference from the framecompare.com comparison link. If it's a better encode, feel free to just drop it over the existing file. I used whatever tool was available at the time. czar 10:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately I can not simply drop it over the old encode because it's over 100MB, the max size updates can have. Therefore a new upload. FakeShemp (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace Although I'm not qualified to quantify the difference between the versions, I do get the impression that the new one is at least slightly better.--Peulle (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace probably also bes to delete the old one and redirect to the new? --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 06:27:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Münster Choraltar 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info Main altar (Hutz-Altar) of Ulm Minster, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful photo.--Peulle (talk) 14:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Some blown areas in the bottom of the center window, but the windows aren't the subject and it looks from the rest of the image like you've done everything you can about things like that. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Icem4k (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - per Peulle -- P999 (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2018 at 01:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Richard-Wagner-Straße 19 Richard-Wagner-Schule N-Seite Fenster 17082018 4110.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, just 8 windows...--Karelj (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support For me it's more than just 8 windows. Interesting colors and composition. --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

• +1 --Laitche (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose --Icem4k (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - We see once again that this kind of photo is popular here, but it doesn't do enough to make me find it special. Maybe if the light were more striking, perhaps. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: The criterion of good photo is not one, I think you have a fixed idea too much --Laitche (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• If you insist on my being more specific, the problem I have with this photo is that it's not that interesting for me to move my eyes around it, and then there isn't anything spectacular purely on the image level that would cause me to vote for a feature even though the form, in the terms in which I understand and experience form as something active involving my eyes moving around the picture frame, is not that interesting. If that's not specific enough for you, I could always choose to fall back on the very unspecific "no wow", which we are permitted to use as a reason for opposing. And if you find my taste uncongenial to you, just accept that it's different from yours, OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sure! --Laitche (talk) 09:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose I see nothing to convince me. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's useful (VI) since it illustrates an architectural style that some might find a bit plain, and it's of good technical quality (QI) but I don't see it being spectacular enough for the FP status.--Peulle (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment User:Alvesgaspar nominated many this kind of photos though only few photos were featured. Yes, the light is not striking but I can also get sort of Zen and static feeling from this photo. In that mean, this one is special, IMHO. --Laitche (talk) 08:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 23:01:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
•  Info created by Tournasol7 - uploaded by Tournasol7 - nominated by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tournasol7 (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I think these colors are real. --Laitche (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I usually don't like flares but this doesn't subtract at all. A bit high on the contrast? Still a support from me either way. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Beautiful view but I can't believe these red rays below the sun, and the sky also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Real or not, it wows me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Colors sort of remind me of the cover of Led Zeppelin's Houses of the Holy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: I like The Rain Song --Laitche (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 21:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Love the lighting in the picture. --Icem4k (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Question I concur with Basile, it doesn't look really realistic. Can you provide an statement about that, Tournasol7? Poco² 19:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment But it is realistic. That sunset was really red-orange. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 21:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info Interior view of the nave of the church of St Felix, Torralba de Ribota, province of Zaragoza, Spain. The church, of mudéjar and late gothic style was built between 1367 and 1420. The church is a national heritage monument in Spain (known as Bien de Interés Cultural) since 2006 and it didn't have a free license image until now. Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Distracting corner at the bottom left -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

  What do you mean? :) Now seriously, I don't think that was a major issue to oppose but still, gone, --Poco² 19:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral after correction. Yes, this dark corner was very intrusive. So please, Poco, understand why I opposed here your picture, instead of contesting the issue you've just fixed. We certainly see things differently. You find this image awesome, while I just consider it very ordinary, with honesty and good faith. We have tons of similar pictures of religious buildings here (mainly christian, not much other religions represented) and this one is just one more. Due to the distorted perspective, this church looks giant inside, while the reality is probably very different. I personally prefer non-deformed perspective because it gives a better idea of how the interior is in truth. The color is yellowish, so not very aesthetic. In these conditions, an intrusive object spoiling the left corner to completely break the symmetry was just too much. This is only my subjective opinion, and your photo also gets 5 supports. Now I'm neutral because the correction was made successfully -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 19:45:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hispasat 30W-6 Mission (40660917561).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
•  Info created by SpaceX - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by Msaynevirta -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --BugWarp (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dark night-shot with harsh contrasts. Not enough of the space ship is visible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small, and a little hard to tell what it was about at first. I'd rather see the whole rocket, the crop at left is bad, and even allowing for the circumstances the noise and posterization are pretty severe. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The rest of the ship should be in the photo. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The space ship isnt visible enough --Icem4k (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 08:57:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Mdbeckwith - uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Σπάρτακος (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I would change the FP Category to Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Done --Σπάρτακος (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I like the earthy, warm colors; I like that you can read the names on the list of vicars on the wall, but I don't like the red halos around the lamps near the altar. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 01:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop at the bottom is too tight and the picture tilted. Also for the red halos mentioned by Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel's weak oppose, as I consider the blown-out lamps and so forth to be unimportant enough to overlook in my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 20:15:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Васягина - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KSK (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
• Looks pretty good, like a strange planet or something, so the wow factor is there. As it's currently downsized by 50%, however, it's a straight-forward  Oppose from me.--Peulle (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sort of per Peulle. The cliffs has a bright thin "aura" that sometimes comes from downsizing. If the original photo was uploaded, I would probably reconsider. --Cart (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  On hold Very nice. I may support the original file -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Cart and Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  On hold per Basile -- P999 (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support WOW --Laitche (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - I love it, but I'm not sure whether to vote for it, as I'd really like to see what the full-size photo looks like, if there is one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

  Here you are, the full size is uploaded on behalf of the author. --KSK (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Thank you. Great, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Photo calendar quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 09:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Otterington railway station MMB 34 185XXX.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Mattbuck - uploaded by Mattbuck - nominated by Pkbwcgs -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean. It is a train passing at speed as the vibrant light shows and it is a silhouetted night time. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

It's called "night" Basile Morin... -mattbuck (Talk) 14:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• Guidelines for nominators : Night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime. Examples of successful night shots recently promoted : 1, 2, 3, but unsuccessful dark shots : 1, 2, 3, recently declined -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• Not sure why you included a daytime shot of a bird among the unsuccessful night nominations or why you chose blood moon photos as they can hardly be photographed in bright light. It would have been better if you used photos of structures and landscapes as examples, those are what the rule you quoted are for. --Cart (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• All night shots are not dark, and all dark shots are not night -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile Morin. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. Interesting idea but too dark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Almost works, but for the lights at left. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 08:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img58 Dallol.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ethiopia
•  Info Gaet'ale Pond in the Danakil Depression, Ethiopia ----- All by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 08:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 11:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Appropriate use of wide angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose A small body of water in a generally flat, dull landscape under a dodgy sky. Doesn't really wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• Similar FPs : 1, 2, 3, 4 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

The first three make abstract patterns of their own not seen here. I opposed the fourth. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Daniel Case. --Karelj (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Yes it's real dull landscape but this image gives me the feeling that I am very thirsty. So a wow, because I am desiring for some water! --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It isn't talking to me, sorry Poco² 19:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2018 at 08:15:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0552-6.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 08:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 08:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Despite moiré. --Laitche (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please, where have you seen moiré? --XRay ^talk 16:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed Hopefully found and fixed. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 16:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice, but the crop ruins it for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2018 at 15:43:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli sul rio di Noale Cannaregio Venezia.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Italy
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I love Venice and its palaces. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I wish the building had been more vivid, but that does not appear to be your fault. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, just house. --Karelj (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• It's not only a house it is also a 15th century palace in Venice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:42, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  • But looks like old unkempt house. --Karelj (talk) 21:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
    • That is what fascinates me of Venice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2018 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese garden pond at Daisen Park in Sakai, January 2016.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Japan
•  Info This shot was taken just after the rain thus some areas were still in shadow of clouds especially on the bottom left. Created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Rather dark. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts:  Brightened. --Laitche (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral Still darker than I'd prefer, but one thing I didn't notice the first time around is that the detail is a bit lacking. Great scene with great lighting though so I won't oppose. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts: I think this lens is not so sharp, I also had Canon EF16-35mm f/4L IS USM in that time but I couldn't use that. Just I didn't have a time to change lens since this scene has disappeared in an instant. --Laitche (talk) 01:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Could be a little bit more tree at the left, but OK. --XRay ^talk 13:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support beautiful composition and colors, although the detail in the trees at the upper right seems less than ideal. --Pine^✉ 07:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2018 at 12:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blackwall DLR station MMB 11.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Mattbuck - uploaded by Mattbuck - nominated by Pkbwcgs -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image consists of lots of cut structures and elements surrounding an empty dark space, sorry, that composition is not working for me. --Cart (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I Like.....it seems confused, like a big city --Σπάρτακος (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cart. I can attest from personal experience before Wikimania 2014 that there are ample featured media opportunities on the DLR; however, this is not one of them. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it, but not enough to vote for it, my apologies. The atmosphere reminds me of Ghost in the Shell movies... --GeXeS (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. Cyberpunky --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Martin. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dark, chaotic, and nothing spectacular there -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Not chaotic, IMO, but exciting. I will support if the horizontal striations in the sky are cleaned up or a natural explanation can be given for them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

  Possibly bits of cloud, honestly not sure. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

  Looks like subtle posterization to me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)

Mon 03 Sep → Sat 08 Sep
Tue 04 Sep → Sun 09 Sep
Wed 05 Sep → Mon 10 Sep
Thu 06 Sep → Tue 11 Sep
Fri 07 Sep → Wed 12 Sep
Sat 08 Sep → Thu 13 Sep

タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)

Wed 29 Aug → Sat 08 Sep
Thu 30 Aug → Sun 09 Sep
Fri 31 Aug → Mon 10 Sep
Sat 01 Sep → Tue 11 Sep
Sun 02 Sep → Wed 12 Sep
Mon 03 Sep → Thu 13 Sep
Tue 04 Sep → Fri 14 Sep
Wed 05 Sep → Sat 15 Sep
Thu 06 Sep → Sun 16 Sep
Fri 07 Sep → Mon 17 Sep
Sat 08 Sep → Tue 18 Sep